What is the Rogerian method?

What is the Rogerian method?

The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. You may already use Rogerian argument in your everyday life to negotiate with your friends, family, and/or romantic partners.

How does Rogerian argument differ from classical rhetoric?

Instead of promoting the adversarial relationship that traditional or classical argument typically sets up between reader and writer, Rogerian argument assumes that if reader and writer can both find common ground about a problem, they are more likely to find a solution to that problem.

What are the four parts to a standard Rogerian argument?

A Rogerian argument typically includes four parts: an introduction that includes the full argumentative landscape, with all positions fairly represented in such a way that the writer demonstrates understanding of and respect for the range of perspectives involved; a rehearsal of situations in which the writer can …

What are the 6 parts of Rogerian argument?

Follow these steps:

  • I. Introduction. Discuss the issue, what’s at stake and any context required for your readers to understand the argument.
  • II. Explain the Opposing View.
  • III. Describe Your Views.
  • IV. Find Common Ground.
  • V. Offer a Compromise.

Why is Rogerian argument important?

The effect is that you’ll be more likely to persuade your listeners or readers. Here are some Rogerian argument ideas. 1. Introduce the problem and show why you and your intended audience are affected by the problem.

How do you do a Rogerian argument?

Tips on writing a Rogerian essay

  1. Know the opposing argument.
  2. Find the common ground.
  3. Embrace your position.
  4. State the arguments for your position.
  5. Outline the opposing arguments.
  6. Restate the common grounds.
  7. Conclude your essay with a brief and concise summary stating your position as well as the common grounds.

What are Rogerian arguments based on?

Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a rhetorical and conflict resolution strategy based on empathizing with others, seeking common ground and mutual understanding and learning, while avoiding the negative effects of extreme attitude polarization.

Where is the thesis in a Rogerian argument?

The Rogerian structure includes the following parts: An introduction that gives a fair assessment of the opposition; a section detailing the viewpoints of the opposition and stating where you see merit in their views; the thesis statement that shows how you have taken the opposition into account but have still …

What is the order in a Rogerian argument?

“The writer who uses the Rogerian strategy attempts to do three things: (1) to convey to the reader that he is understood, (2) to delineate the area within which he believes the reader’s position to be valid, and (3) to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and …

How does Rogerian argument differ from traditional argument?

Traditional Argument: Writer states the claim and gives reasons to prove it. Writer refutes the opponent by showing what is wrong or invalid. Rogerian Argument: The writer states opponent’s claim to demonstrate understanding and shows how its valid.

When should you use Rogerian argument?

Rogerian arguments are oftentimes used in essays such as position papers. One advantage of using Rogerian argumentation is that the writer or speaker gains the attention of the audience and prevents them from immediately arguing in opposition.

How do you write Rogerian?